Karger Publishers
Browse
493546_sm1.pdf (39.99 kB)

Supplementary Material for: Confined Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Refractory Essential Tremor

Download (39.99 kB)
dataset
posted on 2018-11-19, 12:33 authored by Isaacs D.A., Butler J., Sukul V., Rodriguez W., Pallavaram S., Tolleson C., Fang J.Y., Phibbs F.T., Yu H., Konrad P.E., Hedera P.
Background: Thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET). However, 13–40% of patients with an initially robust tremor efficacy lose this benefit over time despite reprogramming attempts. At our institution, a cohort of ET patients with VIM DBS underwent implantation of a second anterior (ventralis oralis anterior; VOA) DBS lead to permit “confined stimulation.” We sought to assess whether confined stimulation conferred additional tremor capture compared to VIM or VOA stimulation alone. Methods: Seven patients participated in a protocol-based programming session during which a video-recorded Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Part A (FTM-A) tremor rating scale was used in the following 4 DBS states: off stimulation, VIM stimulation alone, VOA stimulation alone, and dual lead (confined) stimulation. Results: The average (SD) baseline FTM-A off score was 17.6 (4.0). VIM stimulation alone lowered the average FTM-A total score to 6.9 (4.0). Confined stimulation further attenuated the tremor, reducing the total score to 5.7 (2.8). Conclusions: Confined thalamic DBS can provide additional symptomatic benefits in patients with unsatisfactory tremor control from VIM or VOA stimulation alone.

History

Usage metrics

    Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC