Karger Publishers
Browse
490459sm_1.pdf (394.19 kB)

Supplementary Material for: Utility of Horizontal Sections of Scalp Biopsies in Differentiating between Androgenetic Alopecia and Alopecia Areata

Download (394.19 kB)
dataset
posted on 2018-08-09, 09:54 authored by Yadav D., Khandpur S., Ramam M., Singh M.K., Sharma V.K.
Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and alopecia areata (AA) are common causes of alopecia which can sometimes be difficult to differentiate clinically. Horizontal sections of scalp biopsies are used to study non-cicatricial alopecias due to the ability to perform both quantitative and morphometric analysis of hair follicles on them. Methods: It was a prospective, cross-sectional study conducted to assess the utility of horizontal sections to differentiate between the alopecias. Fifty-two cases were included: 20 cases of male AGA, 11 of female AGA and 21 cases of AA. After clinical examination and dermoscopy, a skin biopsy was taken and subjected to transverse sectioning. Histopathological assessment was done by two dermatopathologists blinded to clinical details. Results: Among the quantitative parameters, terminal:vellus hair ratio (3.08 in AGA and 1.83 in AA, p = 0.0091) and anagen:non-anagen hair ratio (9.25 in AGA and 3.56 in AA, p = 0.0021) were significantly lower in AA. In qualitative parameters, peribulbar inflammation was seen in 63% of AA cases (p = 0.0001). Pigment casts were seen in twice the number of AA (57%) than AGA (26%) cases. Broad avascular stelae and focal trichomalacia were seen in 9.5% of AA cases. Conclusion: Besides peribulbar inflammation, we found a lower anagen:non-anagen hair ratio and presence of pigment casts in transverse sections of scalp biopsies favouring AA over AGA.

History

Usage metrics

    Dermatology

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC