Supplementary Material for: Training Psychiatry Residents in Descriptive Psychopathology: A Systematic Review
datasetposted on 19.02.2021, 09:41 by Etxeandia-Pradera J.-I., Martinez-Uribe D., Bellver-Pradas F., Gonzalez-Piqueras J.-C., Nacher J., Aguilar E.-J.
Purpose: Descriptive psychopathology (DP, sometimes called psychopathology or phenomenology) is the language of psychiatry and is dedicated to the description of mental symptoms. Due to its importance, there is an ongoing case to put it back at the heart of psychiatry and its training. This study seeks to examine the literature on how to train psychiatry residents in DP, including reported educational interventions and educational methods. Method: The authors conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA and BEME guidelines to identify literature on how to train psychiatry residents in DP. In May 2019, they searched in Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science; of 7,199 initial results, 26 sources were finally included for analysis. The assessment tools were the CRAAP test, Kirkpatrick’s 4 levels, and (when applicable) the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results: The mean CRAAP score was 38.885 of a possible 50 (SD 0.983; range: 36.859–40.910). Fourteen sources (53.8%) had some kind of training evaluation: Kirkpatrick’s level 1 was present in nearly all (13) and was the highest in half of them (7). Regarding the educational interventions, the mean MERSQI score was 10.592 of a possible 18 (SD 2.371; range 9.085–12.098). Lectures were the most widely reported educational method (5); among those in clinical settings, the live supervised interview with feedback was the most usual (4). Conclusions: Despite its core importance as the language of psychiatry, the literature about training psychiatry residents in DP is scarce and heterogeneous. General lack of training evaluation and ongoing overemphasis on Kirkpatrick’s levels 1–2 at the expense of levels 3–4 are causes for concern. During the review process, the authors identified a selection of educational interventions that could serve as the basis for the design of new training efforts in both clinical and nonclinical settings. Topics for future research are also suggested, such as the role of DP in competency-based training frameworks now in vogue and a series of neglected contents. Finally, the combined use of the CRAAP test and the MERSQI may be useful for future systematic reviews in medical education.