Karger Publishers
Browse

Supplementary Material for: Urgent contrast-enhanced computed tomography before early colonoscopy in the management of colonic diverticular bleeding: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Download (1.33 MB)
dataset
posted on 2024-10-10, 11:14 authored by Hirai Y., Uraoka T., Wada M., Mori H., Fujimoto A., Sakakibara Y., Toyokawa T., Kagaya T., Sasaki Y., Mannami T., Kuwai T., Watanabe N., Hamada H., Esaka N., Kimura T., Fujii H., Hosoda Y., Shimada M., Miyabayashi H., Somada S., Mabe K., Inoue S., Saito H., Furuya K., Kawamura N., Kudo T., Hori K., Sakamoto N., Kato M., Higuchi N., Harada N., the NHO Network Gastrointestinal Study Group
Introduction: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) has been gaining attention as an initial investigation in the management of colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB), yet the role of CE-CT other than its diagnostic yield, has not been adequately clarified. We aimed to determine whether the use of urgent CE-CT improves identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) in subsequently performed early colonoscopy (≤24 hours of arrival) or other clinical outcomes of CDB. Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial at 23 institutions in Japan. Outpatients with suspected CDB were randomly assigned to undergo either urgent CE-CT followed by early colonoscopy (urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group) or early colonoscopy alone (early-colonoscopy group). The primary outcome was SRH identification. Secondary outcomes included successful endoscopic hemostasis, early (<30 days) and late (<1 year) rebleeding, length of hospital stay and transfusion requirements. Results: In total, 240 patients, mostly in a hemodynamically stable condition, were randomized. A contrast extravasation on CE-CT was observed in 20 of 115 patients (17.4%) in the urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group. SRH was identified in 23 of 115 patients (20.0%) in the urgent-CE-CT + early-colonoscopy group and 21 of 118 patients (17.8%) in the early-colonoscopy group (difference, 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], −7.9 to 12.3; P=0.739). Successful endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in 21 patients in each group (18.3% and 17.8%, respectively) (difference, 0.5; 95% CI, −9.4 to 10.4; P=1.000). There were also no significant differences between groups in early and late rebleeding, length of hospital stay and transfusion requirements. Conclusion: The use of urgent CE-CT before early colonoscopy did not improve SRH identification or other clinical outcomes in patients with suspected CDB in a hemodynamically stable condition. The routine use of urgent CE-CT as an initial investigation is not recommended in this population, also considering the low rate of extravasation-positive cases (UMIN Registry number, UMIN000026865).

History

Usage metrics

    Digestion

    Categories

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC